The Untold Story Of The Last Man On The Moon | Apollo 17 | Spark

  Приказа 1,016,473

Spark

Пре годину

The remarkable story of the determination and courage of a generation. A tribute to three brave astronauts and the thousands of men and women behind them during the final days of NASA's Apollo program.
Subscribe to Spark for more amazing science, tech and engineering videos - goo.gl/LIrlur
Follow us on Facebook: SparkDocs/
Follow us on Instagram: spark_channel?hl=undefined
Content licensed from Espresso to Little Dot Studios. Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
#TheMoon #Apollo #NASA #spark #sparkdocumentary #sciencedocumentary

Коментара
Flame P
Flame P Пре 50 минута
Amazing video, sad that we can fund so many other useless things yet we can't fund science
Joselito
Joselito Пре 9 сати
You sheeples really eat this bullshit up dont 'cha nasa and they're lies.
Denzel Hunga
Denzel Hunga Пре 12 сати
do it again if its real
robert abbott
robert abbott Пре 14 сати
huuu in the vid shows sweeping view several times but I can't seem to see any craters anywhere all looks like the desert but from the overhead view you can see craters every ware by the module all smooth sand even in the hills. just something I notest
P S
P S Пре 21 сат
Great special effects!
Marcus Crassus
Marcus Crassus Пре 22 сата
I'm just interested to know where they managed to stow the hulking transmitter equipment necessary to broadcast live TV from the moon 250,000 miles away, considering in the 1960's early 70's if you stood between the transmitter tower on earth which could be as little as 5 miles away and your TV antenna you'd lose the signal. How much wattage would it take to transmit analogue TV over that distance?
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 2 сата
YOU SAID: "I'm just interested to know where they managed to stow the hulking transmitter equipment necessary to broadcast live TV from the moon 250,000 miles away," == Just Google a photo of the lunar rover. See that dish on it? YOU SAID: "considering in the 1960's early 70's if you stood between the transmitter tower on earth which could be as little as 5 miles away and your TV antenna you'd lose the signal." == Then you should get a better antenna. YOU SAID: "How much wattage would it take to transmit analogue TV over that distance?" == I can't remember the wattage. Memory fades, and it's not worth looking up. It was around the power of a light bulb, though. When you have such huge dishes to receive the signals, you don't need much of a transmitter. Google "Parkes dish" and you can see the size. It's designed to pick up millionths of a watt from pulsars that are lightyears away. It didn't have a problem receiving Apollo's signals. And, if you'd stop and think it through, it's not really all that amazing anyway. You can stick a 1 foot dish on the side of your house and pick up a 50 watt TV signal from geosync orbit satellite that is 25,000 miles away. Imagine the signals you could pick up from a dish that is literally an acre in size.
Prudue McFudd
Prudue McFudd Пре дан
What a load of bollocks. Billions of tax payers funds siphoned off to another pack of swindlers on the East coast of the Med while Kubrick et al shot home style clips of actors in space getups!! NWO already in Over Load Mode even back then!!
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
The veracity of the moon landings does NOT depend on nor does it rely on your acceptance. Quit your bitching as you were probably still loading up diapers at that time or not even born at all. Nothing came out of your pocket so quit complaining.
Milt Farrow
Milt Farrow Пре дан
TELL IT TO STANLEY KUBRIK WHO MADE THE VIDEO
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре сат
@Milt Farrow Ahhh, you mad, bro? lol. The veracity of the moon landings does NOT depend on nor does it rely on your acceptance, conspiratard.
Milt Farrow
Milt Farrow Пре 21 сат
@NebTheWeb stand in line with the rest of the fucking lowlife sellouts
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
You can't even spell Kubrick correctly and you want us to take you seriously? Lol. You know, it would be better if you stop commenting and have people think you might be a moron than for you to comment and remove all doubt.
Zach Becker
Zach Becker Пре дан
All I think about is Eddie Bravo talking trash the whole way through. 🤣
k-carl Manley
k-carl Manley Пре дан
No wonder the public lost interest: we paid the bill, NASA flaunted a pile of rocks and patriotic zeal and kept the big discoveries secret, even wiped the astronauts memories clean, what a sham!
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Ah, you mad, bro?
Rudy Krutar
Rudy Krutar Пре дан
What is the sphere at 25:00?
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Lens flare.
James Ross
James Ross Пре дан
You have to have shit for brains to swallow this
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
You don't have any brains. Let me guess... you opened your mind and they fell out, right? Lol!
James Ross
James Ross Пре дан
What a farce, never happened.
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Nine trips to the moon, with six landings. Yes, it happened. Keep in mind, brainless, that the veracity of the moon landings does NOT depend on nor does it rely on your acceptance. Move on, and go load up your diaper elsewhere.
Jack Savage
Jack Savage Пре дан
Watched the first moon landing live on TV with my wife while in the military in Lawton Oklahoma. We were.kids, she was 19 and I was 20. Came back from Vietnam and was still 19 even after a full tour.
David
David Пре 2 дана
fake shit
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Oh looky, another conspiratard with a "two-word" vocabulary. Not surprised. Most likely a flat earther too. Lol!
UNDERWOOD
UNDERWOOD Пре 2 дана
Funny how the globe was made before planes and supposed space travel, Yet people believe nasa went out into space and confirmed earth was exactly like the globe model designed hundreds of years ago...That's just ignorant to trust the evidence nasa & science put forth to be truth, It's bothers me how easy it is to lie and people fall for it. The true fact is - it's only theories forced as truth.
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре 2 сата
@rockethead7 What goes on in the deep regions between is intergluteal cleft is where he mines his excuses regardless of blood flow. Maybe his "ass hat" is to tight.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 2 сата
@NebTheWeb YOU SAID: "You know, you really should take off that hat, because it seems to be constricting the blood flow to your brain." == Oh, come on here. Get real. I mean, normally I'm on your side, but this is just plain ridiculous, and you should be ashamed of yourself. Clearly, his hat has absolutely nothing to do with blood flow to his brain. If he needs to remove an item of clothing that is restricting flow of blood to his brain, clearly the correct item of clothing would be his underwear (especially the rearward half of his underwear). Neb, I've never seen you get something so tragically wrong as you have here.
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
@Underwood said _"That's just ignorant to trust the evidence nasa & science put forth to be truth, It's bothers me how easy it is to lie and people fall for it."_ - You wouldn't know the 'truth' if it bit you on both sides of your intergluteal cleft. Nothing in science is _just a theory._ What layman (like you) call a theory, scientists call a hypothesis. The difference between your strawman _'just a theory'_ and *'scientific theory'* is the difference between hearsay evidence and forensic evidence. The adjective is operative. You know, you really should take off that hat, because it seems to be constricting the blood flow to your brain.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 2 дана
The irony of it.
UNDERWOOD
UNDERWOOD Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone You can tell your creator that when you meet him...I already knew this would be said and you aren't the last.
Norton Newmann
Norton Newmann Пре 2 дана
I was 15 then, and remember following the entire moon landing project. It was an exciting time... there has been nothing to come close to matching that in the 50 years since! That's when "America was great"... We have nothing like that to offer kids today.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Now all we care about is money. But if people realized the return on investment the Apollo program had we would be on Mars today. Most people think there’s more to life than quarterly reports.
Paul Raisbeck
Paul Raisbeck Пре 2 дана
Horse shit 😂
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Another conspiratard with a two-word vocabulary. Most likely a flat earther too. Not surprised.
U Horst Nightmare
U Horst Nightmare Пре 2 дана
40 yrs ago? It's 50yrs ago now! I was 10 yrs old when Apollo 17 flew and remember myself and my older brother looking through my dad's telescope to see if we could see the astronauts on the moon! I still have the telescope.
How to meet an Extraterrestrial
How to meet an Extraterrestrial Пре 2 дана
I was on restriction when Apollo 11 lifted off the moon. I snuck out of my room, watched the liftoff, and snuck back to my room again.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 28 минута
@How to meet an Extraterrestrial YOU SAID: "Lol." == Sorry, but your memory is inaccurate. I don't know why you are responding with "lol" to that. It wasn't an insult. All of us have memories that change over time, and lose accuracy. I could name a million examples about my own memory that has done the same. YOU SAID: "And how did we get the moon rocks" == By landing 6 Apollo missions on the moon, and 12 astronauts who gathered them up. YOU SAID: "and take images of the Apollo 11 landing site with the LRO?" == By using the camera that Arizona State University built, and by dropping LRO's orbit low enough to increase the relative resolution. They also switched to black and white, rather than color, because LRO's camera (called LROC) has far better resolution in black and white than color. YOU SAID: "Those are rethorical questions." == Then why'd you ask? YOU SAID: "No need to answer, is what that means." == Funny, you can't even spell "rhetorical" correctly, but you're telling me what it means? YOU SAID: "I do recommend getting an education." == They guy who can't spell "rhetorical" is telling me to get an education. Sigh. YOU SAID: "It's all free these days..." == Hey, dummy, did you even read my response? Or did you just blindly assume I was claiming the moon landings didn't happen, and you didn't even read a single word? There was no live liftoff footage of Apollo 11. The only footage they have of Apollo 11's liftoff from the moon was from the 16mm camera, which had to wait until it got home to be developed before anybody could ever see it. And, Aldrin didn't even start the camera in time to capture the first part of the liftoff. Apollo 11's black and white Westinghouse camera that they used for live broadcasts on Apollo 11 was disconnected from the LEM before the astronauts even got back inside. So, yeah, your memory is a bit faulty when you said that you watched Apollo 11's liftoff from the moon live. You probably got it confused with another mission. It happens. Human memory isn't perfect.
How to meet an Extraterrestrial
How to meet an Extraterrestrial Пре 56 минута
@rockethead7 Lol. And how did we get the moon rocks and take images of the Apollo 11 landing site with the LRO? Those are rethorical questions. No need to answer, is what that means. I do recommend getting an education. It's all free these days...
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 2 сата
I'm afraid your memory has altered itself a bit. There wasn't a live broadcast of the Apollo 11 liftoff from the moon (at least not one in which you could see anything). There wasn't a live camera on that mission that captured the liftoff. Maybe you're getting it confused with Apollo 15 or 16 or 17? Those had the live TV camera for the liftoff.
Matilda Grieves
Matilda Grieves Пре 3 дана
The First Man On The Moon And the Last Man On The Moon
david mathiesen
david mathiesen Пре 3 дана
Did the duct tape companies take advantage of the duct tape incident to advertise their product.?
P M
P M Пре 3 дана
First & last man to step on the moon graduated from Purdue University. Boiler up!
Alex
Alex Пре 3 дана
Wagging the moon doggie, Dave McGowan
Tony Sanders
Tony Sanders Пре 3 дана
This is bullshit------ Open your eyes
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Simply making an unsubstantiated claim is not proof of anything other than you are a conspiratard nutjob. Flat earther too?
IFN Media
IFN Media Пре 3 дана
According to wikki it was not taken at 45,000 km but just 29,000 km
dale carpenter
dale carpenter Пре 4 дана
Have you ever tried to use duct tape with gloves on !
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Many times. It works.
dale carpenter
dale carpenter Пре 4 дана
The boulder did not fall off the mountains they are debris that has fallen back to the surface from electric excavation !
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
Lol, thats quite the imagination you have there fellow.
dale carpenter
dale carpenter Пре 4 дана
They are not impact caters !!! They are electric scares!
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
More bullshit conjecture.
Bruce Wooley
Bruce Wooley Пре 4 дана
Duct tape to the rescue . . . don't leave home without it.
Tami Mangel
Tami Mangel Пре 5 дана
What was the temperature on the moon?
NebTheWeb
NebTheWeb Пре дан
They specifically landed during what they called "Lunar Dawn" which is near the moons terminator line. Never did they land during what we here on earth would experience as a "full moon" as doing so would have been too hot for the astronauts.
Lisa Marie Bright
Lisa Marie Bright Пре 5 дана
Ha ha this was a great story. Did you know there was an “escape slide”? The astronauts could “evacuate” to an underground safe room! There’s news footage of it! Those astronauts never left the launch pad! Watch “James Burke demonstrates Apollo Saturn emergency precautions” It’s all been a LIE to establish technological dominance.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 2 сата
YOU SAID: "Ha ha this was a great story. Did you know there was an “escape slide”? The astronauts could “evacuate” to an underground safe room! There’s news footage of it!" == Yeah, there were a few different versions of the escape mechanism throughout Apollo. So what? YOU SAID: "Those astronauts never left the launch pad! Watch “James Burke demonstrates Apollo Saturn emergency precautions”" == Um, yeah, I fail to understand how you can make the bridge between the fact that there was an escape mechanism, and believing that they actually used it. Got any actual evidence? YOU SAID: "It’s all been a LIE to establish technological dominance." == Pfftttt. So, the entire world was dumb enough to fall for it?? But, YOU are the smart one? YOU SAID: "Please explain in detail how these men filmed their take-off from the moon" == Pffttt. Do you think you're the first person in history to ask this trivial question? Do you think the thousands of communications engineers and technicians who designed and built the billion dollar communications network for Apollo were all too dumb to wonder how the video was taken? No? None of those thousands of people in those countries ever thought to themselves, "hey, wait a minute, we never built anything to capture that video!!!"?? No? They all just watched those videos in a complete stupor, failing to realize that they never built anything capable of capturing what we see on the screen? That's how your mind works? == The camera is on the rover. It is remotely controlled by Ed Fendell in Houston. The dish on the rover receives the remote control commands to pan/tilt the camera left/right/up/down, as well as zooming in/out, and adjustments to the contrast/brightness. The rover's batteries had enough charge to drive the rover about 50 miles. But, they never drove it more than about half of that. They also used the batteries to power the communications equipment and camera. YOU SAID: "and how they took off from the moon and traveled back to the earth." == Pffttt. Do you expect an aerospace engineering class over RStoolss comments? Here's the short version: The lunar module had an ascent engine. They separated from the descent stage, and used the ascent engine to climb into lunar orbit. The craft had a rendezvous radar (the dish on the top center of the lander's ascent stage) that tracked the command module, and the computer guided the trajectory to meet up with the command module. They transferred everything from the lunar module to the command module, then jettisoned the lander to go back and crash into the moon. They lit up the service module's SPS engine to break out of lunar orbit. And, from there, they basically "fell" all the way back to Earth. YOU SAID: "Then I won't be an idiot anymore, I'll be smart - like you." == Something tells me that there's no hope for that to ever happen. YOU SAID: "Why didn't they take that vehicle TO moon in the first place?" == They did. What are you talking about? YOU SAID: "If you have data or evidence that they had the technology and the fuel to play with the dune buggy" == Um, no. There was no "fuel" (unless you're counting an electric charge as "fuel," which would be ok if that's what you mean... but I think that's not what you mean). Battery powered cars had been around since the early 1800s. They reached the peak of popularity in the early 1900s. I don't understand why you're so surprised. YOU SAID: "they assembled on the moon then propel themselves from the moon back to earth- please enlighten me." == Um, what? The lunar rover was electric. But, they used rockets to get back home. YOU SAID: "Is the lunar lander in the Smithsonian in Washington D.C. a replica" == No. Not a replica. They originally intended to fly it in space, but they ended up changing the order of things a bit, and it never flew. The Apollo program was moving at a remarkable pace, and if all of the components weren't ready on time for the next mission, they tended to juggle things around. That one you're asking about ended up getting skipped altogether (never flown), and they flew some other missions instead. The museum ended up dressing it up a bit to look a lot more like the ones that actually went to the moon. It's not functional. It has no guidance computer. It has no radar. It actually wasn't even intended to carry people, so it lacks a ton of life support stuff. But, they polished it up and put it on display. There are a few others in a few other museums in various stages of completion. When congress canceled some of the missions, they ended up with a few extra landers in various stages of completion. They scrapped the ones that were barely started. But, the ones that were closer to completion were polished up and put into museums. YOU SAID: "or did they bring that back with them in that little metal can they splashed down in?" == If you want to be taken seriously, ask serious questions. If you want to make an ass of yourself, keep on doing what you're doing.
eventcone
eventcone Пре дан
@Matt Stone That's just the problem - we seem to be producing more dummies to replace them at an increasing rate. They're even getting elected into the White House now. If only we could sterilise them.
Lisa Marie Bright
Lisa Marie Bright Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone Please explain in detail how these men filmed their take-off from the moon and how they took off from the moon and traveled back to the earth. Then I won't be an idiot anymore, I'll be smart - like you. Why didn't they take that vehicle TO moon in the first place? If you have data or evidence that they had the technology and the fuel to play with the dune buggy they assembled on the moon then propel themselves from the moon back to earth- please enlighten me. Is the lunar lander in the Smithsonian in Washington D.C. a replica or did they bring that back with them in that little metal can they splashed down in?
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
eventcone I think this idiot was saying we didn’t go to the moon. I can’t wait for all these dummies to die. They are holding humanity back.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 4 дана
That's right. If something goes wrong on that launch pad whilst that vehicle is loaded with propellant (giving it what Frank Borman called an explosive potential equivalent to a small atom bomb) you didn't want to hang around!
bradley small
bradley small Пре 5 дана
nasa mooned the world
MAD MAX1985
MAD MAX1985 Пре 5 дана
Past presidents put men on the moon Obama put men in the ladies room 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
michaelmisanthrope
michaelmisanthrope Пре 5 дана
This is a beautiful piece of work. Thank you very much "Spark" for uploading it. Does anyone out there in cyber space know why all those monitors at mission control were necessary to men {mostly} who relied on slide rulers? Perhaps if I had a grasp on 60s-70s technology I might be able to get my head around current technology. Probably not but it is all very fascinating. Cheers.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 20 сати
@michaelmisanthrope Depends what you call clean. Wind and solar power?
michaelmisanthrope
michaelmisanthrope Пре 23 сата
@eventcone Thanks. With all the advancements in technology since then why does it seem like nothing good has come of it i.e clean energy?
eventcone
eventcone Пре 4 дана
So they could each monitor a subset of the spacecraft telemetry and tracking data.
George Horner
George Horner Пре 5 дана
YOU TUBE , TREY SMITH , NOAH , IT BEGINS , and then hang on !!!!!!!!! Jesus Christ is Lord.
Ted Phillips
Ted Phillips Пре 5 дана
What about jfk and his inquiry into the Greys?
MELEYMELO
MELEYMELO Пре 5 дана
ITS all bullshit, where did they get all the energy for cooling and heating and pressurising there suits for 8 hours not including 3 days to get there and 3 back , just look at the LEM , you will quickly see its all bullshIt,
Tekipa Kupa
Tekipa Kupa Пре 5 дана
Moon landing is fake..
vanadiumV
vanadiumV Пре 6 дана
the most expansive Movie in whole history of mankind !
zwady
zwady Пре 7 дана
Sorry to say it everyone but if you think we’ve been to the moon you’ve been thoroughly deceived. We haven’t been because we can’t leave earth, and also you can’t land on a ball of plasma. Additionally, the so-called planets were always called wandering stars. When you zoom in on the “planets” all but Saturn and Jupiter look just like all the stars in the nights sky - just flickering lights. So we haven’t been to Mars either as you can’t land on a light
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
That’s funny. You are joking right?
robinrutschman
robinrutschman Пре 7 дана
34:26 December!?!? Help Twinkle Toes!?!?!? So funny, LOL!!!
Alex Murray
Alex Murray Пре 7 дана
Thanks for this interesting document. Congratulations for all people whose participated in this project.
UnionofSouls
UnionofSouls Пре 7 дана
Truth is, they might have been there all along. Maybe they are simply another terrestrial species that we don't know about. There are so many places in the world (and on the world..lol) that are rarely ever sent
ray amundson
ray amundson Пре 8 дана
44:50 to 45:02 if this is the real map of the world we ALL have been lied to ... totally different a MUST SEE. The south pole is HUGE and there are large land masses / islands I do not recognize. here Africa is more north instead of THE EQUATOR GOES THRU Africa. Strange. North America seems to have two large ears extending to top of globe. WHY
Nathan
Nathan Пре 8 дана
The gullibility of people is astounding
Nathan
Nathan Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone re·search /ˈrēˌsərCH,rəˈsərCH/ the systematic investigation into and study of materials What isn't research...is blindly believing what you are told by the government and not looking into it
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Watching RStoolss and reading Wikipedia aren’t research.
Nathan
Nathan Пре 5 дана
@Pythagoras people who blindly believe what the tv says, yet refuse to research independently are dangerous
Pythagoras
Pythagoras Пре 5 дана
muh fake moon landing. Don't you know that echo chambers are dangerous?
Dirk Diggler
Dirk Diggler Пре 8 дана
At 19;15 there is a small dot on the left going by. Can anyone tell me what that is?
Dirk Diggler
Dirk Diggler Пре 7 дана
@rockethead7 yeah maybe thanks
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 7 дана
A loose piece of Mylar? Ice crystals that formed on the lander and are just now getting jogged loose? Not sure.
Sujit Kumar Singh
Sujit Kumar Singh Пре 8 дана
Respect to all those unsung heros who made that possible.
Bradley
Bradley Пре 8 дана
Fake like Vaccines
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
You’re beyond gullible.
Phil Indeblanc
Phil Indeblanc Пре 8 дана
Get the popcorn..this will be the most popular scifi flic in US history. Biggest HOAX on mankind, smallest integrity of man. There are SOoo many errors in missions, you cant even understand how the masses baught the story. Luckily today with the help of some open info flow, over 65%% of people don't believe or accept the story and videos, and data..or lack of data, since all the info on how the crafts were made are missing, the trip datas, everything. So there is no trace of responsibility. Free MAsons controlling your future thought, 22Billion of your dollars a year...because there are ZERO problems in US or on earth, and the hope to bring new suckers from dreaming countries into the dellusion of being on the edge of tech is more profitable than anything else. LOL, listen to the music...most dramatic and thematic there can be to sweep your thoughts into believing...Hollywood is can make ANY dream come true!
James Ko
James Ko Пре 8 дана
Thank you.
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
“...over 65% of people don’t believe...” which conspiracy video did you get that fake data from, Phil?
Phil Indeblanc
Phil Indeblanc Пре 8 дана
@eventcone Lol..sorry to ruffle your feathers. Once you get over your worship(not likely), do real research. I would be shocked if YOU find ANYTHING valid that contradicts your belief.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 8 дана
Nothing in your comment is true. You are the real hoaxer here.
Aussie chippy
Aussie chippy Пре 8 дана
anyone else try talking with their teeth out like old mate? 17:25
bigg Ralph
bigg Ralph Пре 7 дана
Lmmao
Jamar Edoho
Jamar Edoho Пре 8 дана
They sound so excited running around on the moon lol. I can't imagine how much fun that must have been.
Jamma174G
Jamma174G Пре 9 дана
Y'all need to watch NASA secret transmissions... I'm not saying anybody is lying, I'm just saying to fully investigate... You never know
A Thomas Davis
A Thomas Davis Пре 9 дана
It wasn’t the “American people” that lost interest in the program. It was the Democrat politicians and their race hustlers wanting easy funds for the War on Poverty. I worked in that; it was a complete boondoggle and fraud.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Sure you worked on it. I’m sure there was a whole department of morons like you on call. Commenting about politics on a video that has nothing to do with politics make you an effing idiot.
william s
william s Пре 8 дана
🤣
Tinfoilhatnutcase One
Tinfoilhatnutcase One Пре 9 дана
8:02 they did more, traveled farther, stayed longer. Now that they knew where they were allowed to be.
Tinfoilhatnutcase One
Tinfoilhatnutcase One Пре 9 дана
Was it a lack of public interest? Did the United States government decide to go to the moon just to entertain the public?
Georganna Smaltz
Georganna Smaltz Пре 9 дана
Thank you for creating this ❤ 🌎🚀 great article for all of us!!!! 🇺🇲
SquareRootOf2
SquareRootOf2 Пре 9 дана
I feel a bit sorry for engineer Anthony Errington, having to wear those fake dentures that prevent him from fully closing his mouth. No dentures is better than bad dentures. Still, what an amazing life and how fortunate to have been able to participate first hand in one of humanity's greatest endeavors in history. I doubt something similar will ever happen again. You wouldn't be able to even celebrate your success with a cigar these days. So many hypocritical rules and regulations and political correctness would make this kind of team spirit and work impossible currently. Western civilization is dying. It's being destroyed from the inside.
SquareRootOf2
SquareRootOf2 Пре дан
@Matt Stone What's the matter with you? Are you gay or something? Geez, get a grip, snowflake!
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
You can find old pics of him and those are just his teeth. Geez get a life. I’m sure your the best looking person on the planet.
Neil Cassey
Neil Cassey Пре 9 дана
I've been to the moon. I've just decided.
iTzz Gingee
iTzz Gingee Пре 7 дана
Same
TJ Worker
TJ Worker Пре 9 дана
I cried because I cannot believe how many hypnotized people actually believe this bs! SUCKERS!
Manuell
Manuell Пре 9 дана
You don't have the idea that you're actually supporting it? NASA likes publicity. They don't care if it's a bunch of losers...
But wait!
But wait! Пре 9 дана
Never figured Duke Nukem would be into science
DaBudKing
DaBudKing Пре 9 дана
The worlds most monotone voice saying it’s been exciting at some point, I’d be in eternal sleep paralysis if that man kept talking!!!
Miguel Maciel
Miguel Maciel Пре 9 дана
Haha.
H
H Пре 9 дана
Don’t worry about it man never went
lreed53404
lreed53404 Пре 9 дана
if their are only 2 people there who is working the camera
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
@lreed53404 “camera were placed all over the moon” no they weren’t.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 9 дана
@lreed53404 No. One was placed on the Lunar Rover. Wherever the astronauts went, the camera was there with them. Complete with high gain dish antenna to receive commands from earth, and transmit the TV pictures back.
lreed53404
lreed53404 Пре 9 дана
@eventcone But were cameras placed all over the moon
eventcone
eventcone Пре 9 дана
The camera was operated remotely from Mission Control, Houston.
Laba Su
Laba Su Пре 9 дана
This is so stupid ... no one has walked on the moon to this day ..
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
Cool story bro
eventcone
eventcone Пре 9 дана
You're right - your comment was really stupid.
Lila B. Stevenson
Lila B. Stevenson Пре 10 дана
To many stories, not enough truth.
Jimbostonian
Jimbostonian Пре 10 дана
Who gives a fuck .... they got to walk on the moon ....
Shaun Collins
Shaun Collins Пре 10 дана
Man did not m land on the moon in 1969. Or if they did they got warned off by the watchers. Truth
James Ko
James Ko Пре 8 дана
TRUE!
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
Not truth, no.
Shaun Collins
Shaun Collins Пре 10 дана
The moon is not a solid object and its a giant spacestation an orb
frank brown
frank brown Пре 10 дана
It's a bit strange, that despite only two astronauts being on the moon, there was a camera filming, tracking and zooming in on the pair of them. Any explanations ?
frank brown
frank brown Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone . My friend, school is a long way behind me, and for me the end of days fast approaches. If it hadn't been for Von Brawn and his team, America would still have its bare feet stuck in the mud. As I've said before, American rocket design has progressed so fast that they have to buy rocket engines from the RUSSIANS. Ain't that a kick in the teeth for you ?. Seems American brains just ain't up to the job. But let me just set you straight on one thing. Never think that you are talking to some doofus from America, where everybody gets a diploma as long as they can spell their own names, and a PhD if they can tie their own shoe laces. I gained a National Certificate in mining engineering, which included the Mines and Quarries legislation regarding mechanical equipment, and hold a Class 1 Mechanic's certificate. Now. Just to even the playing field, what qualifications do you possess ?. Just so that I know that I'm not conversing with an idiot, you understand.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
They commented on it in the video. Did you not actually watch it and just jumped straight to the comments? They tried four times on previous missions and failed but learned from the failures and made corrections. It’s not that hard. I guess it is for people that struggled in high school while also peaking in high school. Go back to school and remain a lifelong student of life and you will do well. Otherwise you think space is fake and the earth is flat.
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
Grow up Frank. You asked a question, got an answer, then starting stamping your feet and crying. You’re pitiful.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 9 дана
YOU SAID: "It's a bit strange, that despite only two astronauts being on the moon, there was a camera filming, tracking and zooming in on the pair of them. Any explanations ?" == Yes, that dish on the rover provided the communications back to Earth. This allowed TV signals to go back to Earth, and remote control signals to be received from one of three main stations in Australia, Spain, or USA. YOU SAID: "So NASA could control the camera in real time, when there's a two minute time lag due to distance ?." == Pfftt. TWO MINUTES? Why would you think that? It's not even two seconds. The lag between the Earth and moon is about 1.3 seconds (or 2.6 seconds round trip). YOU SAID: "Now tell us the one about the Pope and the Barmaid." == He gave you a polite answer, and you are immediately rejecting it? YOU SAID: "Haaa bloody Haaa Haaa." == Laugh all you want, it doesn't make you correct, it just shows your ignorance. YOU SAID: "And you say I'm the impolite one ?" == Yes, you sure are. You ask questions with no intention of listening to answers. You accuse thousands of people of perpetrating a criminal fraud, based on your own ignorance, and absolutely stupid notions about radio taking 2 minutes to reach the moon from Earth. YOU SAID: "How dare you, SCUMBAG. There's not another country on Earth as impolite as America" == How do you even know he's from America? And, while it's colloquially called "America," I'm sure you're actually referring to the USA. "America" is a continent, or, two continents, if you prefer. YOU SAID: "You've all got this idea that Americans are some kind of superior race," == If you think it takes two minutes for radio to reach the moon, you're not doing yourself any favors with regard to feelings of "superiority." YOU SAID: "but all you've got is money to burn, and not enough sense to spend it wisely." == You got that right. Can't argue with you there. YOU SAID: "We aren't talking light speed here," == Yes, radio signals travel at light speed. It's all part of the same electromagnetic spectrum. YOU SAID: "we are talking about a system which is little better than morse code," == Um, no. TV signals and radio remote control inputs are not done with any "code" anywhere remotely like "Morse." YOU SAID: "and being trasmitted at radio wave speeds," == Yes, which is the speed of light. YOU SAID: "Dah dah dit dit dah, and it takes an aweful lot of dits and dahs to send a control signal which then has to be decoded," == Nope. YOU SAID: "especially when you consider that the best computer they had on board had less computational capacity than a basic calculator." == Um, dummy, they didn't use a computer to control the camera. These were just servos and radio signals. It's the same basic type that had been used since WWI to remote control boats, or WWII to remote control planes. No computers (for that function). Yes, they had a guidance computer onboard the lander. But, that had absolutely nothing to do with the television camera, or the controls for the television camera. YOU SAID: "But you carry on deceiving yourself" == Pfftttt. Oh, the irony. YOU SAID: "like you did over WMD and the Twin Towers, and Pearl harbour, and the Lucitania." == This is how ALL delusional minds operate. When you express one topic that makes it clear that you are completely ignorant (like the speed of radio transmissions, or the servo controls of cameras), you quickly diffuse the situation before anybody can respond, by changing topics. YOU SAID: "America is sinking into barbarism, and despite all your brave talk, you still do * all about it.Your government has lied to you ever since you stole the land from the Plains Indians. The government are past masters of lying, and you swallow their bullshit like it was Manna from heaven. There's no wonder 75% of the pop[ulation are Thieving Toe Rags who would take anything that isn't nailed down. They even go abroad to steal other countries resources. If America sank beneath the wave tomorrow like Atlantis, nobody in the world would mourn your passing." == I'm sorry that your jealousy has so completely overpowered your ability to think straight. But, that's not my problem. That's your problem.
frank brown
frank brown Пре 9 дана
@eventcone . Haaa bloody Haaa Haaa. And you say I'm the impolite one ?. How dare you, SCUMBAG.There's not another country on Earth as impolite as America You've all got this idea that Americans are some kind of superior race, but all you've got is money to burn, and not enough sense to spend it wisely. We aren't talking light speed here, we are talking about a system which is little better than morse code, and being trasmitted at radio wave speeds, Dah dah dit dit dah, and it takes an aweful lot of dits and dahs to send a control signal which then has to be decoded, especially when you consider that the best computer they had on board had less computational capacity than a basic calculator. But you carry on deceiving yourself, like you did over WMD and the Twin Towers, and Pearl harbour, and the Lucitania. America is sinking into barbarism, and despite all your brave talk, you still do fuck all about it.Your government has lied to you ever since you stole the land from the Plains Indians. The government are past masters of lying, and you swallow their bullshit like it was Manna from heaven. There's no wonder 75% of the pop[ulation are Thieving Toe Rags who would take anything that isn't nailed down. They even go abroad to steal other countries resources. If America sank beneath the wave tomorrow like Atlantis, nobody in the world would mourn your passing.
Justus Hattingh
Justus Hattingh Пре 10 дана
Why do you only see blackness, NO Stars. From earth we see Stars. But from the Moon, one should see far more clearly the stars and milkyway. WHY ??
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
When you look up during the day do you see stars? There’s your answer. Always remember that there is such a thing as a stupid question and you managed to ask it. You could have found that out in two seconds.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 10 дана
Well you would - if you were standing on the night side of the lunar surface. On the sunlit side, where you are surrounded by the bright, sunlit landscape, your eyes react to protect your retina (the optic nerve) from this reflected light and make it impossible to see anything as dim as starlight. Theoretically, an astronaut might be able to set his viewing angle so that the landscape was removed from his field of view. He would have to make sure also that other sunlit objects were not within his field of view, not to mention the sun itself and perhaps the Earth. In other words so that all he was seeing was black sky. That may not be so easy in those spacesuits, with a heavy pack on your back. But if you could manage it your eyes would slowly adjust until the stars came into view. I believe some of the Apollo astronauts, those who had more time on the surface than Armstrong and Aldrin, tried to see stars, standing in the shadow of the LM to assist this, and were successful in doing so (at least to some extent).
jamie 0'rourke
jamie 0'rourke Пре 10 дана
can anyone explain why they jumped in slowmotion
eventcone
eventcone Пре 10 дана
Acceleration due to gravity - that is the rate at which you fall - on the Moon is approximately 1/6th of what it is on Earth. So if you make a jump from the surface it takes correspondingly longer to reach the 'top' of your jump, and to fall back to the surface. When you jump of the surface, this acceleration is happening both whilst your body is moving upwards (slowing you down), and when it is moving back to the surface (speeding you up). This basic principle also affects walking, running etc because walking and running also involve falling under gravity, because we are relying on gravity to pull us down onto our leading foot. So the less the gravitational acceleration, the slower this process. This gives the whole process a look of 'slow motion'.
Daniel D
Daniel D Пре 10 дана
Glad I watched
Buddy Reynolds
Buddy Reynolds Пре 11 дана
The moon is still in the gravity well of the earth.
wide awake
wide awake Пре 11 дана
i give up at 33mins my IQ is above a 5 yr olds there's so many things wrong with this video its pathetic, but number one has to be (like every other bullcrap moon doc) using the JFK speech which was years before any fake moon landing, he made that speech when they believed it was possible to reach the moon he died 6 yrs before any fake moon landing and would not have allowed it to be faked he was a good HONEST man and should not be used by these lying parasites to substantiate there lies he had nothing to do with it don't tar his name to this crapp
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Yes you have an IQ over a 5 year old. All the way up to a 6 year old.
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 3 дана
@wide awake What you call ramblings, the entire educated world calls schooling. You’re spineless, ignorant, and devoid of anything even remotely intelligent to say.
wide awake
wide awake Пре 3 дана
@Mark Stone more ramblings from a moontard you are a waste of my time!
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 4 дана
@wide awake You made claims, failed completely to back them up, ran away from the thread when I called you on your bs, and now you’re back to confusing distance with elevation. You’re taking an analogy literally. You saw this Everest analogy in a conspiracy video, were completely suckered in by it, didn’t bother to give it any thought, and now consider yourself in a position to argue against decades of evidence. You’re scientifically illiterate, which is probably why you fell for the demonstrably false claims that the moon landings were faked.
wide awake
wide awake Пре 4 дана
@Mark Stone are you reading the correct post? what are you rambling on about you weirdo? read the posts again, you haven't called me out on anything that's my point! just like when you decided you had schooled me without posting anything too you are a full blown weirdo. i did however school you on how many people had achieved one of mans greatest feats climbing mount everest at around 8800 meters since 1954, and i also pointed out how strange it would be if nobody had climbed higher than 16.5 meters by today. to which you replied its a distance not a elevation? like somehow this amazing revelation debunked a principal of logic, you are a idiot full stop! so to make it easier for you little billy we can use a submarine if you like! if a submarine had gone to depths of 8800 meters in 1954 but could only reach depths of 16.5 meters today, wouldn't you find that very very strange too little billy?
wide awake
wide awake Пре 11 дана
pure science fiction
Mark Stone
Mark Stone Пре 8 дана
Cool story bro
Graham Tallent
Graham Tallent Пре 11 дана
Anthony Errington did all the wiring on all the equipment. He spliced and joined all the wiring with his teeth.
The MemoryHole
The MemoryHole Пре 11 дана
I just saw Capricorn One, a 70's era movie. It was amazing. I don't want to spoil it so I won't tell you too much. It's about mission to Mars. It's available free on YT. Make sure you use an ad blocker. You know how those free movies are.
michaelmisanthrope
michaelmisanthrope Пре 5 дана
I agree. I still think of Kubrik's "2001 a Space Odyssey" as the greatest sci-fi and perhaps one of the greatest films ever made.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 7 дана
@wide awake Erudite.
wide awake
wide awake Пре 8 дана
@eventcone you do talk some crapp don't ya lol as a young man you were a rent boy
eventcone
eventcone Пре 11 дана
I first saw that movie many years ago as a young man. I enjoyed at the time as an exciting thriller. However with a more mature eye I came to realise that like many movies its plotline is a nonsense - as I suspect even its makers realised.
Gerald Miller
Gerald Miller Пре 11 дана
I was 18 years of age when the last Apollo mission returned from the moon. This year it will be fifty years since then. I will be 68 years old. The greatest mistake the USA ever made was stopping people from continuing the human component of planetary exploration. We wasted trillions of dollars on wars of choice. And now...the Space Farce.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Here here!
Gerald Miller
Gerald Miller Пре 11 дана
50 years is way, way, way too long a wait before sending people to Mars.
frank brown
frank brown Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone . It's called intuitive thinking, Mate. The ability to extract logic from meaningless garbage. 50 years or more since they sent the last man to the moon, (If they actually did), and rocketry is still dependant on setting light to the arse of the of the rocket ?. The Chinese were doing that when Marco Polo went to steal their secrets. The moon, just 250,000 miles away, Mars a hell of a lot further, and they were struggling to carry enough fuel to get them to the moon, and apart from the escape jump, coasting all the way back. Sorry, but there are no Filling Stations on the road to Mars, and it wouldn't help if there were, because they throw away the gas tanks just to shed enough weight to leave Earth's gravity well. Spit and splutter all you like Chum, but facts will remain facts, and the laws of physics will always apply.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
frank brown there is no debate. Only amongst idiots that need to feel special that they have hidden secret knowledge that only they were able to glean. RStoolss videos and Wikipedia aren’t research.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 9 дана
@frank brown So, you didn't read what I wrote, but I'm wrong about what I wrote? That's your level of intelligence here? See, that's the thing about crackpots like you, you never address the answers to your own questions/statements. You come to an open comments forum, spew stupidity everywhere, pretend you know things you don't know, then when someone presents you with stuff you can't deal with, you declare victory, change topics, and run for the hills. Yeah, go ahead and block me, crackpot. You're obviously not listening to anything anybody tells you. You're a lost cause. Your brain is a one-way street, and you're proud of it.
frank brown
frank brown Пре 9 дана
@rockethead7 . You said, who said, they said, we said. What do you think you are, some sort of analyst ?.You have the cheek to call me barely literate when the majority of Americans have trouble spelling their own names ?. I'll have you know that I am a First class Mechanic, with a National Certificate in Mining Engineering from the Ministry of Fuel and Power. What's your qualification ?. Brain surgeon ?. Nose picker extraordinary ?. Pot washer and burger flipper ?. Come on, MOUTH ALMIGHTY, let's be knowing, and don't think for one moment that you can lie about it, even though lying is an American preoccupation. I've not read all the sloppy shit that youve wiped on the page. I'd sooner cut my own head off. My Mother taught me to tollerate fools and children, but a foolish child is something I can't stand, so FUCK OFF. One more tirade from you and I will block your silly arse.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 9 дана
@frank brown YOU SAID: "Surviveability of a trip to Mars and back is ZERO," == Pfffttt. So says who? YOU?? You're the barely literate crackpot who (from the other thread) thinks radio waves take 2 minutes to reach the moon, remember? You are fundamentally wrong about even a basic entry level understanding of these things. Why would you think you understand how survivable a mission to Mars is/isn't? YOU SAID: "and it's still debatable whether the moon landings were faked," == Nope. There is no "debate." There are just a bunch of crackpots like you, who don't understand anything about it, but declare it fake out of your complete ignorance. YOU SAID: "just to poke Russia in the eye." == Yup. And, why would they "fall for it" if it was a hoax? They tracked the Apollo missions to the moon and back with their radar, just as many countries did. They aimed their radio telescopes AT THE MOON and received the broadcasts, just like many countries did. But, the Soviets went even further than that. They actually sent up Luna 15 (unmanned probe) to the moon a couple of days before Apollo 11, which waited in orbit around the moon for Apollo 11 to get there and land. Then, when the astronauts were on the lunar surface, they commanded the Luna 15 lander to land in the Sea of Tranquility, with the intention of grabbing lunar samples and racing Apollo 11 home with the first samples from the moon. It failed, because it was a rushed mission, and they ended up making some mistakes, and Luna 15 crashed into a lunar mountain instead of a soft landing. But, the point is, they tracked Apollo 11 all the way to the moon (as well as dozens of other countries). So, how do you explain that? If this was all just an elaborate hoax that somehow bluffed the entire planet at the time, and still continues to bluff all of the world's space agencies in every country that has one, friendly or enemy, why would the Soviets fall for it? Why didn't they say, "hey, we tracked Apollo 11, and it never went to the moon!!"? Why not? Or, for that matter, why didn't Madagascar (they tracked Apollo also)? Canary Islands? Guam? Australia? Spain? UK? Mexico? Nigeria? Ascension Island? Bermuda? Turks and Caicos? Antigua? Etc.? The Soviets, the USA, and all of those other countries, and more, tracked Apollo with radar and/or radio telescopes. And, there were even some backyard amateurs around the world who had good enough dishes pointed at the moon which picked up Apollo's audio signals. How do you explain that? If it's all just a big "hoax" to "poke Russia in the eye," why would they (the Soviets) and any other country even fall for it? What do YOU know that they didn't? YOU SAID: "In 50 years surely technology would have improved enough to make a trip to the moon and back something of little consequence." == Um, no. Minute for minute, dollar for dollar, man for man, there has been no exploration in history that has been even remotely close to Apollo. If you adjust into today's dollars, the USA spent about $16 BILLION per person who walked on the moon. And, given that two were on the lunar surface at a time, this equates out to around $50 million per minute (in today's adjusted dollars). Yes, advancement in technology has reduced those costs. And, Artemis is not projected to cost anywhere near what Apollo costed (not that I trust the estimates, I'm just telling you what the projections are). But, sorry, rocket technology doesn't advance at the pace of computer technology. And, frankly, it can't ever advance at that pace, because rocketry depends on a hell of a lot of thermodynamic laws to operate. Even if you used modern technology to increase a rocket's efficiency to 99% (not going to happen, but, just hypothetically), yeah, it's still a massive undertaking to go to the moon. But, methinks you don't know anything about thermodynamics, so I'm wasting my time trying to reason with you. YOU SAID: "Yet here we are with even the Shuttle program shut down because of all the failures that resulted in catastrophic loss of life." == No, it was shut down because it reached the end of its serviceable life. They kept on flying after Challenger. They kept on flying after Columbia. Those failures didn't stop them. Congress stopped them by pulling the plug on the program. The space shuttle program started in 1972, and was stopped in 2011. That's 4 decades. How long does a program need to run before it's ok (in your mind) to pull the plug? Oh, but no, in your mind, that wasn't long enough, eh? And, they stopped it because of the loss of life (even though they kept flying after the losses of life)?? Good gods, what a dummy.
Gerald Miller
Gerald Miller Пре 11 дана
What were the three canceled missions supposed to do?
Gerald Miller
Gerald Miller Пре 11 дана
The biggest mistake was not continuing to the moon and beyond. Our priority became war and not science.
Matt Yabs
Matt Yabs Пре 9 дана
It wasn't a mistake. There wasn't nor is a scientific argument to be had for sending humans on missions to the moon or other planets. Why send 100kg of astronaut that can't say anything other than "I'm here" when you can send a probe/explorer that tells you a lot more for a lot less money. As a mining argument it makes sense to mine the moon for helium 3, whilst needing a lot ot science to make that work, it isn' purely science based decision.
Joe Blow
Joe Blow Пре 11 дана
these fucking adds!!!!
Ray Duffill
Ray Duffill Пре 12 дана
The Temperature of the Moon ranges from 250 Fahrenheit in Daytime to Minus 208 Fahrenheit at Night, so how were these trips possible ?
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
Their suits were insulated and the temperature was regulated so they were at a constant temp. No need to warm up or cool down.
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 11 дана
Ray, you've been answered already. But, keep in mind, one "day" on the moon is a month on Earth. They were never there in the super-hot temperatures, and never there in the super-cold temperatures.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 11 дана
No landings took place at these times, but in the lunar mornings when the surface temperature was somewhere between these two extremes. It takes time for the surface to heat up from the low point at night as the sun climbs oh so slowly above the horizon. The highs occurred in the local afternoon, long after the missions had departed. And it is ONLY the surface temperature - in the absence of atmosphere there is no ambient temperature.
jayda jones
jayda jones Пре 12 дана
No one has ever been to the moon it is not possible .The Moon landing was a big fat lie. you can not leave low Earth orbit .That is why the astronauts who had an interview when they allegedly returned from space looked so gutted because they never went they were having to sit there and lie. Just go and watch the interview they were clearly not happy with the situation they had been put in.
jayda jones
jayda jones Пре 2 дана
@Matt Stone Gullible
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
They looked “gutted” because after getting back from the moon they spent another 21 days in quarantine in essentially a Winnebago. You would have looked like that too. I’m sure they wanted to get back to their families. I learned this while getting my astronomy degree but I’m sure you could have looked it up in ten seconds.
eventcone
eventcone Пре 11 дана
No one has ever faked a moonlanding - it is not possible. Concentrate on the objective evidence, not on how YOU THINK the astronauts should behave after returning.
Tejča Srejča
Tejča Srejča Пре 12 дана
why are they still talking about first man in space is Yuri Gagarin? When SSSR colapsed numerous documents where declassified and one of them was about who is actually the firs man in space and that titel belonges to Major General Vladimir Sergeyevich Ilyushin
Federico Riggio
Federico Riggio Пре 12 дана
The arguements between nations are caused exactly by the fact that the space and resources of the planet are limited. If we lived in a flat unlimited infinite world, the resources would also be infinite. And there would be no need to argue. And a world with no boundaries would be possible. The probation which each man is put in front of by God since the very first moment in which he is born is exactly to deal with these limits: the narrowness of everything, the limited duration of his life, the limits of the fruitage of his efforts and, above all, the limits of his knowledge.
frank brown
frank brown Пре 10 дана
No resources except for those which provide energy, are limited. The only thing that IS limited is the will to recycle EVERYTHING. Maybe one day, people will have to be mining dumps for salvageable raw materials. Even something as abundant as iron will soon be scarce, when hundreds of thousands of tons of steel are regularly sent to the bottom of the sea when a ship's useful life ends, instead of the whole thing being salvaged and recycled or repurposed.
Ralph Turner
Ralph Turner Пре 12 дана
Thank you for the answer my friend!.
Flat Earth Fisherman
Flat Earth Fisherman Пре 13 дана
The Earth is Flat you idiots. The moon landings were a hoax.
dark azurr
dark azurr Пре 13 дана
its the search for life that makes us search space we havent been on the moon for what 50+ years now?
mark R. Devereux
mark R. Devereux Пре 13 дана
This propaganda folks same old fakery the sheeple can digest. This proves nothing. The debunkers use the same low intelligent arguments and laboratory testing to discourage reexamination of evidence. I ve looked at video of experts who can't In good conscience support NASA s own publicly accessible archives and equipment on display. Its laughable.
Teresa 67 Factoid
Teresa 67 Factoid Пре 13 дана
Apollo. Biggest hoax ever perpetrated. Nobody has set foot on the moon.
Matt Stone
Matt Stone Пре 2 дана
And knowledge has never stepped foot into your brain.
Zac Zayn
Zac Zayn Пре 13 дана
Duct tape... such an high tech device really useful here on Earth as well as on the Moon Don't really know how to react now. :.. to Cry or to Laugh.. but now I pretty convinced that its (...)
frank brown
frank brown Пре 10 дана
I've a feeling that the adhesive on the Duct Tape would boil off and dry up in the near vacuum on the moon. Perhaps someone with a vacuum chamber will do this experiment to test its veracity ?.
Rob Stanley
Rob Stanley Пре 13 дана
Hey guys! That sounds like a young Will Lyman the voice of the popular PBS Frontline narrating this doc, yes/no?
Pete Pete
Pete Pete Пре 13 дана
I remember these days of early moon exploration the first successful landing was body shaking hair rising
Southeastern777
Southeastern777 Пре 10 дана
@frank brown Nice carbon-copy, "Cut & Paste" example of a boiler plate troll, boy. Someday years from now, you might even be able to think up something original. Keep up the good work, Francis ;-)
frank brown
frank brown Пре 10 дана
Yeah. It's a pity the video of the Astronaut coming down the ladder didn't show him as solid as the lander itself. You can literally see through him to the background. Looks more like a ghost that a solid human being. What with that and the man in the moon taking a video of the pair of them, and panning the camera and zooming it in on the rock one of them was holding, makes one have serious doubts about the whole Disney Production. And that's not even mentioning the external camera some distance behind the orbital module taking videos of it as it passed over the moon. I notice also, that we are never shown how the return capsule docked with the orbital module, which would have been quite a feat of engineering seeing that the capsule exit was on the curved side of the capsule.
Gavin Ward
Gavin Ward Пре 13 дана
Great documentary. I know the credits state they used representative film footage throughout the documentary, not always Apollo 17 or the mission being depicted, but at 20:23 Ron Evans is shown in Mission Control Houston when he was actually in the Command Module in Lunar Orbit - not the smartest edit!😉
EIRE 32
EIRE 32 Пре 13 дана
You would want to be really gullible to think man walked on the moon in the late 60's with the same TEC that is in an old flip phone, and they say we haven't got the Technology to go back
rockethead7
rockethead7 Пре 11 дана
YOU SAID: "You would want to be really gullible to think man walked on the moon in the late 60's" == What? Gullible? Like the entirety of the planet's space agencies? Like the entirety of the physics and aerospace engineering community world wide? YOU SAID: "with the same TEC that is in an old flip phone," == Um, no. YOU SAID: "and they say we haven't got the Technology to go back" == Well, we don't. We have the knowhow. But, the equipment itself, and all means to manufacture it, were retired almost 50 years ago. YOU SAID: "are you for real?" == I think it's quite clear that the other person was mocking you. YOU SAID: "You think that tinfoil "landing" carft landed on the moon?" == There was no tinfoil. And, yes, six of them landed on the moon. YOU SAID: "Also they lost all the data," == That's ridiculous. Why would you believe that? YOU SAID: "they gave Holland "a moon rock" but the Dutch aren't silly and had the moon rock tested and it was nothing more than petrified wood." == Wrong. NASA gave nobody a petrified wood rock. The Dutch ART MUSEUM accepted a rock without verifying it. They even contacted NASA to ask if the rock was real, and NASA said they had no such record of the rock, but would analyze it if they sent it to them. The art museum didn't take them up on the offer, and instead, stuck it in a drawer for FOURTEEN YEARS. It was instantly spotted as a fake when they finally put it on display. The nation's science museum had both of their genuine lunar samples on display for decades. Why would you believe this claptrap? If a museum accepts a fake Rolex watch as a donation, does this mean that there are no genuine Rolex watches? No? So, why would a fake moon rock be any indication of what the rest of the planet's moon rocks consist of? Don't you think the other hundreds upon hundreds of rocks would have been looked at if they found out that a Dutch sample wasn't real? No? The rest of the planet's museums are too stupid to check on their samples? No? A Dutch art museum got a fake rock as a donation, didn't lift a finger to verify if it was authentic or not, and now this means that the entire planet's samples are fake too (but nobody ever checked)? That's how this goes, in your mind? YOU SAID: "Why all the lies?" == I dunno, why do you and others like you keep lying? YOU SAID: "Let's not forget NASA have said in recent interviews that when they figure out how to get through the Van Allan belt then they can go to the moon." == That's ridiculous also. You are butchering a quote about TESTING THE ORION CAPSULE. Yes, they wanted to test the Orion capsule in 2014 before ever putting people inside. They did the same on Apollo 6. They sent an unmanned Apollo capsule through the belts and back before ever putting people up there. It passed the tests. They wanted to do the same thing for the Orion capsule, and did so. Why are you still quoting from that old video? The Orion capsule passed the tests soon after that video was made. Why are you calling it a "recent" video? YOU SAID: "I thought they already went to the moon." == Oh, so testing the Orion capsule shouldn't be done? That's how this goes? If they wanted to test the wings on a 747 airplane back in 1969, would you have said, "hey, we already have WWI biplanes, those wings have been tested, why do we need to test new wings?" No? It's not a good idea, in your mind, to test newer computers, new spacecraft, new mission parameters, etc., before putting people inside? YOU SAID: "Also 20 years later at live Aid they had trouble televising that all around the world at the same time but you think they were able to televise the moon landing all around the world at the same time in the 60's from the moon, come on man" == So, let me get this straight... in your mind, once they televise something from the moon, never again in subsequent history is anybody on the planet ever allowed to have a communication problem, otherwise the moon landings were faked?? That's your "logic" here? After the moon landings took place, the entire planet must have every communications broadcast from that point forward go flawlessly, never a single interruption allowed, otherwise the moon landings were fake?? THAT is how your brain operates?? Lay off of the drugs, you moron.
EIRE 32
EIRE 32 Пре 13 дана
@SKY HIGH MEDIA SOLUTIONS are you for real? You think that tinfoil "landing" carft landed on the moon? Also they lost all the data, they gave Holland "a moon rock" but the Dutch aren't silly and had the moon rock tested and it was nothing more than petrified wood. Why all the lies? Let's not forget NASA have said in recent interviews that when they figure out how to get through the Van Allan belt then they can go to the moon. I thought they already went to the moon. Also 20 years later at live Aid they had trouble televising that all around the world at the same time but you think they were able to televise the moon landing all around the world at the same time in the 60's from the moon, come on man
SKY HIGH MEDIA SOLUTIONS
SKY HIGH MEDIA SOLUTIONS Пре 13 дана
Its called determination and bravery. We for sure went to the moon. We haven't gone back BECAUSE of the technology we have nowadays. It would expose all the alien bases hidden on the opposite or "dark side" of the moon.
freak777power
freak777power Пре 14 дана
No one ever went to Moon. There was only one real attempt to leave Low Earth Orbit done by Russian cosmonaut and he died in the process. Let's cut the bullshit here.
J Calhoun
J Calhoun Пре 14 дана
Yes, let's do cut the bullshit. How about if YOU provide some proof of your claims rather than simply talking out of your ass?
Hertzair
Hertzair Пре 14 дана
Sadly, no mention of Wernher Von Braun.
Apollo 16 - Nothing So Hidden
29:22
AIRBOYD
Приказа 1,1 мил
DEVITO x MIKE RIDE - AUSTRIA 🇦🇹
3:10
devito anonymo
Приказа 2 мил
Sedmo nebo - sitni kolač za praznike
8:03
Domaći Recepti
Приказа 120 хиљ.
CORONA X RIMSKI - GUCCI BLUZE (OFFICIAL VIDEO)
3:11
KDM Exclusive
Приказа 2,2 мил
Will Starship and Commercial Landers Make Artemis Better Than Apollo?
1:02:13
Naked Science - Moon Mysteries
50:08
Naked Science
Приказа 3,3 мил
Moon mission | DW Documentary
42:26
DW Documentary
Приказа 1,4 мил
Apollo 13 The Real Story
40:06
Roberto Mastri
Приказа 1,4 мил
Why Didn't The World End In 2012? | Mayan Revelations: Decoding Baqtun | Timeline
1:21:12
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Приказа 3,4 мил
DEVITO x MIKE RIDE - AUSTRIA 🇦🇹
3:10
devito anonymo
Приказа 2 мил
Sedmo nebo - sitni kolač za praznike
8:03
Domaći Recepti
Приказа 120 хиљ.
CORONA X RIMSKI - GUCCI BLUZE (OFFICIAL VIDEO)
3:11
KDM Exclusive
Приказа 2,2 мил
LIGHTSABER vs BANK VAULT ($30,000 GIVEAWAY)
10:28
the Hacksmith
Приказа 4,5 мил
3D STAMPAO ruku za KAMERU / 3D PRINTING Camera Arm
34:55
Ćaletova Radionica
Приказа 148 хиљ.
GLORYDAYZ TRAŽI PREDMETE U GRADU ZA 60 MINUTA
12:22
Mozzart
Приказа 27 хиљ.
Joe Rogan Experience #1552 - Matthew McConaughey
1:51:55
PowerfulJRE
Приказа 3,5 мил
Huawei Mate 40 Pro Unboxing - WHAT.
9:52
Mrwhosetheboss
Приказа 2,4 мил
iPhone 12 and 12 Pro Unboxing!
17:12
iJustine
Приказа 3,3 мил